I didnt like so much, liked it more in other Fallout titles. In NV I liked the Quests, the RPG elements that could affect The way you solved quests, some of the reputation system and Factions and some bits of the Story (it wasn't all good, some stuff was not my cup of tea)īut the Game Design, the bugs oh God the bugs, the blend world, companions, the DLCs, the Setting etc. Exploring is a pretty important thing for me, because of that I love TES Games, Fallout and the Gothic Games (great Action RPGs, with a top notch livid World design and Quests!! Quests like in NV different Faction bound quests and nearly all different to solve) The mohave desert looked all the same, only the forest in the north with the supernutants was something different. Also Obsidian, they didn't do themselves a favour with the world design. Exploring the world of new vegas aside of quests and quest locations, it was meh. The world was a lot more interesting and exploring the capital wasteland was soo good. If I remember right, New Vegas was the game that made them go 'Okay, we're going to do our own games and this time we won't use paper to keep track of bugs.' Which terrifyingly was a thing, apparently. Because of that I always liked Fallout 3 more, even if the story is weaker and there is no reputation system. Well, they've gotten better since New Vegas.
It has a hell lot of flaws, especially in game and world design. After the 9999th thread about "what do you like most about fnv?" There came in mind, hey that game is good yes, but it is definitely not perfect as a lot of fanboys act like it is.
0 kommentar(er)
